stage5 prompt: add explicit section ordering guidance — follow the workflow
Sections should mirror the actual production workflow: foundations before finishing, construction before glue, sound sources before processing before mix-bus treatment. Includes the test: 'would a producer follow these steps in this sequence?' and a natural flow template (framework → construction → combining/refining → quality checks).
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b06828aaa
commit
9e1feae76d
1 changed files with 17 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -50,7 +50,23 @@ Rhythm within each section: Problem → the creator's solution → specific impl
|
|||
|
||||
Example: "In dense arrangements, the snare body competes with the sub bass for attention. ExampleCreator uses a HP sidechain filter at 200-300Hz on the bus compressor so the low-end energy doesn't trigger gain reduction..."
|
||||
|
||||
Merge moments that address the same problem. Build sections in the order of a natural production workflow. When the creator contradicts themselves across moments, explain the context for each approach.
|
||||
Merge moments that address the same problem. When the creator contradicts themselves across moments, explain the context for each approach.
|
||||
|
||||
## Section ordering — follow the workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**This is critical.** Order sections so a reader's journey mirrors the actual production workflow. Foundations come before finishing touches. Construction comes before glue. Sound sources come before processing comes before mix-bus treatment.
|
||||
|
||||
Think about what a producer would actually do in their DAW: they wouldn't reach for the binding distortion before they've built the layers it's binding. The article should read the same way. If a technique has three layers and then a glue stage, the sections should cover the three layers first, then the glue — even if the creator explained them in a different order in the video.
|
||||
|
||||
The test: read your section headings in order and ask "would a producer follow these steps in this sequence?" If a section describes a process that depends on something covered in a later section, reorder them.
|
||||
|
||||
For technique-oriented pages, a natural flow is typically:
|
||||
1. The conceptual framework (what are the building blocks?)
|
||||
2. Constructing or shaping each element (the core work)
|
||||
3. Combining, processing, or refining the result (the glue, the polish)
|
||||
4. Context-dependent adjustments or quality checks (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
This ordering also creates a satisfying reading arc — the reader builds understanding piece by piece, and the final section ties everything together. A "binding agent" section hits harder at the end because the reader now understands exactly what it's binding.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reader context
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue